Capablanca vs Yates
281827
[Event "K+R+4P vs K+R+3P"]
[Site "www.masterchessopen.com"]
[Date "1930.01.01"]
[Round "0"]
[White "Capablanca"]
[Black "Yates"]
[Result "1-0"]
[EventType "simul"]
[EventRounds "2"]
[EventCountry "ENG"]
[FEN "8/5pkp/R5p1/8/1r6/4PKPP/5P2/8 w - - 0 1"]
{ 3. Rook and Four Pawns Versus Rook and Three Pawns With this material
balance, the two most common pawn configurations in practice are: 1) all pawns
on the same flank, or 2) both sides each have three pawns on the same flank,
while one has a passed pawn on the other flank. When all pawns are on the same
flank, the 4:3 pawn ratio allows more winning chances than a 3:2 ratio. Still,
the natural outcome is a draw, assuming the defending side does not play as
passively as in the previous example. Diagram #177: Capablanca-Yates, Hastings
1930/31, from an earlier point than diagram 176. } 1.Ra5! { Preparing g3-g4,
which if done immediately allows a pawn exchange leading to a draw: 1.g4 Rb5
and 2...h5 etc. } (1.g4 Rb5 2.-- h5 $11) 1...Rc4? { Passive waiting. As we
will see below, White can create chances only by advancing his h-pawn.
Therefore 1...h5! is mandatory, when Black has nothing to fear (see also
Diagram #178). } (1...h5!) 2.g4! { Preventing the most important defensive
move, ...h7-h5 } h6 3.Kg3 Rc1 4.Kg2 Rc4 5.Rd5 Ra4 6.f4 Ra2+ 7.Kg3 Re2 8.Re5
Re1 9.Kf2 Rh1 10.Kg2 Re1 11.h4 Kf6 { Better is 11...Ra1 12.h5 gxh5 13.Rxh5 f6!
since it is proven that White cannot win this position. } (11...Ra1 12.h5 gxh5
13.Rxh5 f6 $11) 12.h5! Re2+ 13.Kf3 Re1 { Another mistake! Black should have
played 13...Rh2. } (13...Rh2) 14.Ra5 Kg7 15.hxg6 Kxg6 { An obligatory
weakening of the pawns, as after 15...fxg6 16.Ra7+ Kg8 (or 16...Kf6 17.Rh7+-)
17.e4! Rf1 18.Ke3 Rg1 19.f5! Rxg4 20.f6! the two connected white pawns are
decisive. } (15...fxg6 16.Ra7+ Kg8 (16...Kf6 17.Rh7 $18) 17.e4! Rf1+ 18.Ke3
Rg1 19.f5! Rxg4 20.f6 $18) 16.e4 Rf1+ 17.Kg3 Rg1+ 18.Kh3 Rf1 19.Rf5 Re1?? {
After 19...f6! the position should end in a draw. } (19...f6 $11) 20.e5 Re3+
21.Kg2 Ra3 22.Rf6+ Kg7 23.Rb6?! { Correct would be 23.Rd6+-. } (23.Rd6 $18)
23...Re3? { Black did not take advantage of White's lack of precision, by
restoring equality by 23...Ra4! 24.Kf3 Ra3+ 25.Ke4 Ra4+ 26.Kf5 Rc4 27.Rb7 Kg8!
28.e6 fxe6+ 29.Ke5 h5! After the text move 23...Re3? we have the position of
Diagram #176, in which Capablanca demonstrated a certain victory. But Black
had to make a number of mistakes to get there! } (23...Ra4! 24.Kf3 Ra3+ 25.Ke4
Ra4+ 26.Kf5 Rc4 27.Rb7 Kg8! 28.e6 fxe6+ 29.Ke5 h5!) 1-0
1-0
http://chessmicrobase.com/microbases/4173/games/281827?token=vbn83t4j
You are viewing a shared game, sign up now for a free account to copy this game to your own microbase, and store, analyse and share games.
83
HITS
Loading game viewer...
Players | |
---|---|
White | Capablanca |
Black | Yates |
Game | |
---|---|
Moves | 23 |
Opening | |
Result | 1-0 |
Date | January 01, 1930 |
Tags |
Tournament | |
---|---|
Tournament | K+R+4P vs K+R+3P |
Location | www.masterchessopen.com |
Round | 0 |