Mildenhall, John vs Lane, Tim
18 Feb 2019
1055736
[Date "2019.02.18"]
[White "Mildenhall, John"]
[Black "Lane, Tim"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C01"]
[Opening "French: Exchange"]
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5 4.Be3 Bd6 5.c4 c6 6.Nc3 Ne7 7.cxd5 Nxd5 8.Nxd5
cxd5 9.Bd3 Nc6 10.Ne2 Qb6 11.Qd2 Be6 12.O-O Rc8 13.Nc3 O-O 14.Be2 Ne7 15.Rfc1
a6 16.Na4 Qa7 17.Rxc8 Rxc8 18.Rc1 Qb8 19.Rxc8+ Bxc8 20.g3 Qc7 21.Nc5 Kh8 {I
wasn't sure how to improve my position, and eventually decided on ...Ng8 and
...Nf6. I chose h8 for the K in preference to f8 to avoid any cheapo checks
from the knight on c5.} 22.Bd3 Bf5 {But now I decided to see if he wanted to
trade his good bishop for my bad one. I realised this would leave b7 weak,
but reckoned I would get good N vs bad B as compensation. And I turned out to
be right!} 23.Bxf5 Nxf5 24.Qd3 Ne7 {Just ... g6 is better.} 25.Qb3 Bxc5
26.dxc5 Qd7 27.Qc3 Nc6 28.Bf4 Kg8 29.b4 {I don't like this because it makes it
harder for him to attack b7.} Qf5 {Threatening ...Qb1+.} 30.Qe1 h6 {It's hard
to foresee that the game will be over in another four moves.} 31.Qd2 {A
serious error. He played the Q to e1 precisely to prevent ... Qb1+, but now
he allows it.} Qb1+ 32.Kg2 Nxb4 33.a3 Nd3 34.Bd6 {Missing the threat.} Ne1+
{Game over – moving the K to the back rank costs the Q, and the other line is
35. Kh3 Qf5+; 36. g4 Qf3+; 37. Bg3 Qg2+; 38. Kh4 Nf3+; 39. Kh5 Qh3+; 40. Bh4
Qxh4#. I'm honest enough to admit I hadn't seen this through to the mate, but
John obviously had, as he resigned at once.} 0-1
0-1
http://chessmicrobase.com/microbases/12228/games/1055736?token=wvfjnbqn