James Watson (1858) vs Robert Bailey (1524)
1135656
[Event "Spielvogel Memorial"]
[Date "2017.02.02"]
[Round "2"]
[White "James Watson"]
[Black "Robert Bailey"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1858"]
[BlackElo "1524"]
[ECO "A65"]
[Opening "Benoni: 6.e4"]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 e6 4.Nc3 exd5 5.cxd5 d6 6.e4 g6 7.f4 Nfd7? {(JW) The
correct move order is 7...Bg7 8.Bb5+ then Nfd7. Which is considered blacks
best try. (RB) Yes, I got my move order wrong in the standard Mikenas Attack.
JB and I have played quite a few of these over the years.} 8.a4 {(JW) This may
not be the best way to exploit the inaccurate move order however I figured
worst case it transposes back in to the mainline. (7.Bg7 8.Bb5+ Nfd7 9.a4)
Also I had in mind the idea that an early Nb5 might cause black problems and
so this ties in with that allowing me to meet Qb6 with a5} Bg7 9.Nb5?! {(JW)
9.Bb5 would transpose back into book, however instead simply Nf3 and white has
an improved version. The engine points out this move is bad, but only for some
specific variations that few humans would calculate from here. (RB) This
surprised me and looked quite speculative, the early knight foray seemingly
ignoring standard development. I thought at first simply returning the knight
to f6 was adequate until I found the more interesting O-O with Qe7 plan.}
O-O!! {(JW) This is actually blacks best move which I hadn't given due
consideration. which I should have since its exactly the sort of this that
needs to be checked before playing something like Nb5. I had originally
thought Black would need to play ...Bg7 leaving white up tempi, though black
would get some back with a6 next move kicking my knight. Rob came up with the
better move however.} 10.Nxd6? {(JW) I had thought for a few minutes before
playing this because I had to calculate the consequences of Qe7 and a piece
sac on e5. Whilst it turns out my calculations were accurate, my evaluations
of the resulting position was a little off. (BvR) I wanted to have better
look, since I am unfamiliar with this variation, and I don't understand why
both black (Ng8-f6-fd7) and white (Nb1-c3-b5) played their horses twice before
move 9. Seemingly (to me) without reasons. The position was so interesting
that I analysed a bit further, and came to the conclusion that some of James'
comments are inaccurate. As 10.Nxd6.. turns out to be a mistake, I assume that
9.Nb5 was part of an incorrect plan. Rob's 9th move (O-O) was the best move of
the whole game. Prepared? (RB) Unfortunately not Bas - my logic was only that
in previous games where James had taken on d6 that I'd managed to win the
game! I do enjoy the Benoni however. ;)} Qe7 11.e5? {(JW) The point here is to
meet a sac on e5 with taking on c8 and even though black gets doublecheck
discoveries, the fact that the knight is attacking the queen means it works
out for white. (BvR, it doesn't work out for white. See further) For example
11...Bxe5?? 12.Nxc8 Bc3+ 13.Kf2 Bd4?? 14.Qxd4. or 11...Nxe5 12.Nxc8 Nf3+
13.Kf2 Bd4+ 14.Kxf3 is fine for white (14.Qxd4?? Qe1+). Both players
calculated these lines and figured it works out for white however the engine
points out that one of the sacrifices works for black. (BvR) I disagree with
James' general impression that white is doing OK. Whilst, in fact after the
mistake Nxd6, white should have been in serious trouble. I have added the
question-mark to 11.e5?, because now 11...Nxe5! would have worked well for
black if he had spotted the fantastic combination: 12.Nxc8, Nd3+!! (not Nf3+);
13.Kd2, Rxc8; 14.Bxd3, c4; 15.Be2, c3!! and black is winning. (RB ) That's a
nice line Bas, thanks for illustrating it. I spent far too long on the clock
trying to make one of the double checks work and sadly didn't find c4 after
Nd3. To flourish, have courage as they say!} Na6?? {(JW) It turns out that
11...Nxe5 is a near winning attack for the specific reason that black can play
c4 and bring the queen to b4, otherwise white is holding fine. 11...Nxe5
12.Nxc8 Nd3+! 13.Kd2 when I thought white is fine since black doesn't have all
their pieces developed and white should have adequate defense. However
13...Rxc8 14.Bxd3 black has ...c4 and Qb4 which is very strong. (BvR) ..c3
instead of Qb4, see my comments before, ie black is winning..} 12.Bxa6 bxa6
13.Be3?? {(JW) During and after play I felt this was bad and the engine
confirms it does give black lots of resources. Instead white should just play
Nf3 with clear advantage. (BvR) Correct, white reduces his advantage from
+1.80 to +0.40, had black played 13...f6 instead of 13..Rb8 (?);} Rb8 14.Rb1?
{(BvR) A weak move, as it allows 14.. Bxe5! 15.fxe5,Qxe5; 16.Nc4, Qe4
(-0.50).} Rb4? {(JW) Missing another chance to sac on e5, this time the point
is that black will get a battery on the e file in a few lines.} 15.Nf3 {(JW)
From here there isn't much more to be done. Provided white doesn't make any
blunders its too much of an advantage to be overcome.} Bb7? {(BvR) A bad
choice in a difficult position for black. Had he played 15..f6 instead, white
would have a manageable (for black) +1.30 advantage, compared with +2.60 after
Bb7. From here on it is a 'walk in the park' for James, with an extra pawn, a
strong pawn-centre and a double pawn for black.} 16.Nxb7 Rxb7 17.O-O Rfb8
18.Rf2 Rb3 19.Re2 R8b7 20.Qc2 Bf8 21.d6 Qd8 22.Qc4 Qb8 23.Ng5 {(JW) Black only
had a few seconds on the clock which isnt enough time to create defensive
resources. An interesting game that could have gone any which way early on.}
{#r} 1-0
1-0
http://chessmicrobase.com/microbases/11262/games/1135656?token=4s8ncdes
You are viewing a shared game, sign up now for a free account to copy this game to your own microbase, and store, analyse and share games.
19
HITS
Loading game viewer...
Players | |
---|---|
White | James Watson (1858) |
Black | Robert Bailey (1524) |
Game | |
---|---|
Moves | 23 |
Opening | A65 — Benoni: 6.e4 |
Result | 1-0 |
Date | February 02, 2017 |
Tags |
Tournament | |
---|---|
Tournament | Spielvogel Memorial |
Location | |
Round | 2 |